CA · State record

Are You Flocked in California?

Everything currently documented in our database for California — the communities, the agencies, the vendors and the source links behind each record.

Database last updated 2026-08-07

323

Documented ALPR deployments

195

Verified Flock Safety

128

ALPR — vendor unconfirmed

284

Communities with a record

California on the Flock Map

Markers sit at the municipality or agency, never at a guessed camera pole.

Loading map…

Communities with documented deployments (284)

Community-mapped cameras only (432)

These California municipalities contain mapped ALPR camera locations from DeFlock/OpenStreetMap inside their boundary, but we hold no official or EFF deployment record for them. Mapped cameras found — municipal deployment not independently verified.

Latest Flockery from California

COURTSNorthern District of California

Federal Court Follows Bartholomew Reasoning in Denying Motion to Dismiss ALPR Lawsuit

A federal judge in the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss in McGinty v. Reimagined Parking, holding the plaintiff plausibly alleged harm to his 'right to know' about ALPR use in two parking garages. The analysis, written by defense-side lawyers, argues it is the first federal decision to follow California state-court reasoning that inadequate ALPR disclosure alone can survive dismissal. It involves parking-operator ALPR rather than Flock, but the disclosure theory travels.

Global Privacy Watch (Seyfarth Shaw)Aug 13, 2026News reportingOther ALPR

PRIVACYChico, CA

Chico police shared license plate reader data with ICE. What happens to the cameras now?

After the department acknowledged that federal immigration agencies had access to its ALPR data — which California law restricts — NSPR looks at what happens to Chico's cameras next. The city has an internal investigation underway; the police chief has said the sharing should not have happened.

North State Public RadioAug 12, 2026News reportingFlock Safety

COURTSSan Jose, CA

Judge issues tentative ruling in San Jose license plate reader lawsuit

A judge tentatively sided with San Jose, accepting the city's argument that its roughly 500 interconnected plate readers should be treated like ordinary surveillance cameras. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which sued in late 2025, argues such networks amount to digital location tracking that demands a higher legal standard. A final ruling could shape how large ALPR networks are governed in California.

KTVU FOX 2Aug 6, 2026News reportingOther ALPR

See all flockery →

What this page can't tell you

Every figure above counts records in our database, not cameras. A community that isn't listed simply has no verified record currently in our database — that is never evidence that cameras are absent. Agencies also add and cancel contracts faster than public datasets update.

Camera counts, prices, retention and sharing policies appear only where we found a primary source. Browse those in the Flock Files, or send us a record we're missing.

Data attribution

Portions of the surveillance deployment data on this site come from the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Atlas of Surveillance. atlasofsurveillance.org ↗ Are You Flocked? is independent and is not affiliated with the EFF or Flock Safety. Database last updated 2026-08-07.