Verified Flock

Are there Flock cameras in Vernon, California?

Yep. Vernon is flocked.

Are there Flock cameras in Vernon, California?

Yes. Public records in our database document Flock Safety automated license plate readers in Vernon, California recorded for Vernon Police Department. Separately, 8 individual ALPR camera locations mapped by OpenStreetMap contributors fall inside the municipal boundary, 7 of them source-tagged Flock Safety.

Agency
Vernon Police Department
Vendor
Flock Safety
County
Los Angeles County
Records on file
1
Mapped cameras inside boundary
8
Source-tagged Flock Safety
7
Latest cited source
4/25/2016
Database last updated
2026-08-07
Share this result

What's on file

Agency

Vernon Police Department

Agency type

Police

Jurisdiction

Municipal

County

Los Angeles County

State

California (CA)

Vendor

Flock Safety

The Vernon Police Department operates automated license plate readers.

Verified deployment detail

No primary sources on file yet

Cameras / readers

Not publicly verified

Contract price

Not publicly verified

Contract start

Not publicly verified

Contract end

Not publicly verified

Data retention

Not publicly verified

Data sharing documented

Not publicly verified

Date approved

Not publicly verified

ALPR policy

Not publicly verified

Contract / public record

Not publicly verified

Flock transparency portal

Not publicly verified

Every value above is transcribed from the linked document. Nothing is estimated or inferred, and claims circulating on social media are never published here. “Not publicly verified” means we have not found a reliable primary or reported source — never that the thing does not exist.

Sources · record AOS000943

What this record does not say

These entries document that an agency has been reported to use ALPR technology. They do not establish camera counts, exact locations, cost, retention periods or sharing policies unless the linked source says so.

Know more than we do?

Contracts, council minutes and records responses are the fastest way to fill in the blanks. Send us what you've found.

Sources & records

Everything on this page traces back to the records below. Where a record carries no linked document, we say so instead of filling the gap.

Documented deployment records

Deployment records come from the EFF Atlas of Surveillance ↗. Database last updated 2026-08-07.

Community-mapped camera locations

8 mapped camera points inside the Vernon boundary, from OpenStreetMap contributors via the DeFlock ↗ dataset (ODbL). Each point links to its own OpenStreetMap record in the camera list on this page.

Camera points are matched to this municipality by point-in-polygon containment against US Census Bureau cartographic boundaries (2023) — the coordinate falls inside the municipal boundary. Containment is a statement about location only, never about ownership, operation, purchase or deployment.

Nearby documented deployments

Other California communities with a record in our database — nearest by county first. Absence from this list is not evidence of absence.

All California records →

Relevant Flockery from California

COURTSNorthern District of California

Federal Court Follows Bartholomew Reasoning in Denying Motion to Dismiss ALPR Lawsuit

A federal judge in the Northern District of California denied a motion to dismiss in McGinty v. Reimagined Parking, holding the plaintiff plausibly alleged harm to his 'right to know' about ALPR use in two parking garages. The analysis, written by defense-side lawyers, argues it is the first federal decision to follow California state-court reasoning that inadequate ALPR disclosure alone can survive dismissal. It involves parking-operator ALPR rather than Flock, but the disclosure theory travels.

Global Privacy Watch (Seyfarth Shaw)Aug 13, 2026News reportingOther ALPR

PRIVACYChico, CA

Chico police shared license plate reader data with ICE. What happens to the cameras now?

After the department acknowledged that federal immigration agencies had access to its ALPR data — which California law restricts — NSPR looks at what happens to Chico's cameras next. The city has an internal investigation underway; the police chief has said the sharing should not have happened.

North State Public RadioAug 12, 2026News reportingFlock Safety

COURTSSan Jose, CA

Judge issues tentative ruling in San Jose license plate reader lawsuit

A judge tentatively sided with San Jose, accepting the city's argument that its roughly 500 interconnected plate readers should be treated like ordinary surveillance cameras. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which sued in late 2025, argues such networks amount to digital location tracking that demands a higher legal standard. A final ruling could shape how large ALPR networks are governed in California.

KTVU FOX 2Aug 6, 2026News reportingOther ALPR

See all flockery →

Camera counts, contract prices, retention and sharing policies are shown only where we found a primary source. Where they're missing, the information is not publicly verified — see the Flock Files for the documents we do have.

Data attribution

Portions of the surveillance deployment data on this site come from the Electronic Frontier Foundation's Atlas of Surveillance. atlasofsurveillance.org ↗ Are You Flocked? is independent and is not affiliated with the EFF or Flock Safety. Database last updated 2026-08-07.

Join the flock

Get the week's weirdest surveillance stories and new Flocked towns.

No spam. Unsubscribe whenever. We are not, ourselves, a database company.